.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

2005/02/02

men&woman

little thought experiment:
male A is going out with female B. Nothing to serious, no kids, no semi-detached house(yet), perhaps they share a flat, who knows. Extension, they are married, does this actually make a difference?Now B meets male C. Male C is a stereotype single male, good at hsi job, loves it, has a "empty" flat with interior from habitat. They get intrested in each other. He knows about A and the relationship between A and B. Can someone think of a reason why C should feel constrained to say No! to B if things that are considered cheating are going to happen? If both of them are not drunk or A and B just had a fight. Should not B be the one to decided?
The obvious answere people are giving is stuff like

Its not fair!
Would you want to be A?
It is something you do not do!
Moral!

I can think of a load of reasons why C should say no but thats something completly different. There is a load of stuff you can talk about in this problem but I am just interested in an answere to this particiular problem. Not what happens afterwards or anythign like that
Thank you for using soem brain cycles to think about it

2 Comments:

  • give me a name for A, for B and for C...
    and i'll answer ;]] form every point of interest
    good night
    >>>wiesel

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 4/2/05 14:53  

  • As C obviously stands for christian (the curch thingie jesus follower type of guy) he'll go to hell1!!1

    So he better say no and offers himself as chief witness to inquisition.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 4/2/05 23:39  

Post a Comment

<< Home